Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrancisco, Inês-
dc.contributor.authorTravassos, Raquel-
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Catarina-
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Madalena-
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Filipa-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Flávia-
dc.contributor.authorMarto, Carlos Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorCarrilho, Eunice-
dc.contributor.authorOliveiros, Bárbara-
dc.contributor.authorPaula, Anabela Baptista-
dc.contributor.authorVale, Francisco-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T09:02:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-20T09:02:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-03-
dc.identifier.issn2306-5354pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectadhesionpt
dc.subjectbondingpt
dc.subjectdental porcelainpt
dc.subjectglass ceramicspt
dc.subjectorthodontic bracketpt
dc.subjectshear strengthpt
dc.titleWhat Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysispt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.firstPage14pt
degois.publication.issue1pt
degois.publication.titleBioengineeringpt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bioengineering9010014pt
degois.publication.volume9pt
dc.date.embargo2022-01-03*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3283-5104-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5682-3191-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9269-5417-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5759-5557-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7836-8161-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2615-2929-
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D ICBR - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D CIBB - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Sep 23, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Jul 2, 2024

Page view(s)

128
checked on Sep 24, 2024

Download(s)

75
checked on Sep 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons