Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103506
Title: A Comparison of Biosolids Production and System Efficiency between Activated Sludge, Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor, and Sequencing Batch Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor in the Dairy Wastewater Treatment
Authors: Boavida-Dias, Rui 
Silva, João R.
Santos, Andreia D. 
Martins, Rui C. 
Castro, Luís M. M. N. 
Ferreira, Rosa M. Quinta 
Keywords: wastewater treatment; dairy effluent; activated sludge; moving-bed biofilm reactor; sequencing-batch moving-bed biofilm reactor; biological treatment; carbon removal; nutrient removal
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: MDPI
metadata.degois.publication.title: Sustainability (Switzerland)
metadata.degois.publication.volume: 14
metadata.degois.publication.issue: 5
Abstract: Dairy industry wastewater is rich in organic content, presenting a high biodegradability, and therefore biological treatments are widely employed. This study aimed to evaluate biosolids production in three systems: activated sludge (AS), movingbed biofilm reactor (MBBR), and sequencingbatch movingbed biofilm reactor (SBMBBR). Simulated dairy wastewater was used at different organic load rates (OLRs): 1.22, 2.87, and 5.44 gCOD L􀀀1d􀀀1. Besides biosolids production, COD, total carbon (TC), and total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency was evaluated. Biosolids production was measured in the mixed liquor, carrier-adhered biomass, treated wastewater, and surplus sludge. The operational conditions were kept similar for the three systems, with a carrier filling ratio of 50% for MBBR and SBMBBR. The SBMBBR proved to have better performance in the removal efficiencies of COD, TC, and TN for all OLRs studied. The MBBR presented a similar COD and TC removal efficiency as the SBBR for the two highest OLRs (2.87 and 5.44 gCOD L􀀀1d􀀀1). Concerning biosolids production, the MBBR system produced less biomass and delivered the lowest amount of adhered biomass inside the carriers. The AS treatment generated the highest amount of sludge and offered the worst treatment capability for all OLRs evaluated.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/103506
ISSN: 2071-1050
DOI: 10.3390/su14052702
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Eng.Química - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D CERES - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Nov 2, 2024

Page view(s)

150
checked on Nov 5, 2024

Download(s)

175
checked on Nov 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons