Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/106362
Title: | Surface Comparison of Three Different Commercial Custom-Made Titanium Meshes Produced by SLM for Dental Applications | Authors: | Cruz, Nuno Martins, Maria Inês Domingos Santos, José Gil Mur, Javier Tondela, João Paulo |
Keywords: | biomaterial; bone regeneration; titanium mesh; 3D printing; surface properties; roughness | Issue Date: | 8-May-2020 | Publisher: | MDPI | metadata.degois.publication.title: | Materials | metadata.degois.publication.volume: | 13 | metadata.degois.publication.issue: | 9 | Abstract: | The use of individualized titanium meshes has been referred to in scientific literature since 2011. There are many advantages to its use, however, the main complications are related to early or late exposures. As some aspects such as its surface properties have been pointed out to influence the soft tissue response, this study was designed to compare the surface characteristics of three commercially available individualized titanium meshes between them and according to the manufacturer's specifications. The results from the scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and the contact profilometry measurements were analyzed and cross-checked. It was discovered that, the BoneEasy's post-processing superficial treatment was more refined, as it delivers the mesh with the lowest Ra value, 0.61 ± 0.14 µm, due to the applied electropolishing. On the other hand, the Yxoss CBR® mesh from ReOss® was sandblasted, presenting an extremely rough surface with a Ra of 6.59 ± 0.76 µm. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/106362 | ISSN: | 1996-1944 | DOI: | 10.3390/ma13092177 | Rights: | openAccess |
Appears in Collections: | FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Surface-comparison-of-three-different-commercial-custommade-titanium-meshes-produced-by-SLM-for-dental-applicationsMaterials.pdf | 2.37 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Nov 4, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
10
checked on Nov 2, 2024
Page view(s)
74
checked on Nov 5, 2024
Download(s)
33
checked on Nov 5, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License