Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146
Title: Mechanical Characterization of Different Aluminium Foams at High Strain Rates
Authors: Amaro, Ana M. 
Neto, Maria A. 
Cirne, José S. 
Reis, Paulo N. B. 
Keywords: aluminium foams; high strain rates; Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB); mechanical properties
Issue Date: 1-May-2019
Publisher: MDPI
Project: UID/EMS/00285/2013 
metadata.degois.publication.title: Materials
metadata.degois.publication.volume: 12
metadata.degois.publication.issue: 9
Abstract: Samples having nominal compositions of AlSi12 and Al6082-T4 were prepared using a lost wax casting process, with nominal relative densities of 20%, 40%, and 60%, as well as arrangements of a uniform cell structure (US) or a dual-size cell (DS). For comparison, samples of aluminium foam-filled tubes having the same nominal composition were also prepared with the same technique, with nominal relative densities of 20% and similar arrangements (US and DS). Impact tests at different velocities were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). It is possible to conclude that Al6082-T4 foams have better performance, in both configurations, than the AlSi12 ones. Considering a uniform cell structure and a density of 20%, the absorbed energy by the Al6082-T4 foams was around 25% higher than the value observed for the AlSi12 ones. In terms of arrangement, the US structure presents absorbed energy around 57% lower than the DS ones, while the AlSi12 foams with a relative density of 20% were compared. Finally, the absorbed energy growths from 2.8 × 105 to 5.2 × 105 J/m3, when the density increased from 20% to 60%. However, when these foams were involved with a tube, the performances increased substantially.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107146
ISSN: 1996-1944
DOI: 10.3390/ma12091428
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FCTUC Eng.Mecânica - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D CEMMPRE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
checked on Oct 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Page view(s)

79
checked on Oct 29, 2024

Download(s)

24
checked on Oct 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons