Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/112313
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMontoro-Bombú, Raynier-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Beatriz-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Amândio-
dc.contributor.authorRama, Luis-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T12:10:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-29T12:10:52Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-22-
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/112313-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, there has been an exponential increase in the number of devices developed to measure or estimate physical exercise. However, before these devices can be used in a practical and research environment, it is necessary to determine their validity and reliability. The purpose of this study is to test the validity and reliability of a load cell sensor-based device (LC) for measuring the peak force (PFr) and the rate of force development (RFD) during the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) test, using a force plate (FP) as the gold standard. Forty-two undergraduate sport science students (male and female) participated in this study. In a single session, they performed three repetitions of the IMTP test, being tested simultaneously with an LC device and a Kistler force platform (FP). The PFr and RFD data were obtained from the force-time curve of the FP and compared with the LC data, provided automatically by the software of the device (Smart Traction device©). The mean difference between the results obtained by the LC device and the gold-standard equipment (FP) was not significantly different (p > 0.05), for both PFr and RFD, which suggests the validity of the ST results. Bland-Altman analysis showed a small mean difference in PFr = 1.69 N, upper bound = 47.88 N, and lower bound = -51.27 N. RFD showed that the mean difference was -5.27 N/s, upper limit = 44.36 N/s, and lower limit = -54.91 N/s. Our results suggest that the LC device can be used in the assessment of the isometric-mid-thigh-pull test as a valid and reliable tool. It is recommended that this device's users consider these research results before putting the ST into clinical practice.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherMDPIpt
dc.rightsopenAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt
dc.subjectforcept
dc.subjectstrengthpt
dc.subjectrate of force developmentpt
dc.subjectpeak forcept
dc.subjectforce-time curvept
dc.titleValidity and Reliability of a Load Cell Sensor-Based Device for Assessment of the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull Testpt
dc.typearticlept
degois.publication.firstPage5832pt
degois.publication.issue13pt
degois.publication.titleSensorspt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s23135832-
degois.publication.volume23pt
dc.date.embargo2023-06-22*
dc.identifier.pmid37447682-
uc.date.periodoEmbargo0pt
dc.identifier.eissn1424-8220-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIDAF - Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity-
crisitem.author.researchunitCIDAF - Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2885-7666-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1033-6985-
Appears in Collections:FCDEF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
I&D CIDAF - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Oct 28, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Page view(s)

89
checked on Oct 30, 2024

Download(s)

37
checked on Oct 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons