Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaçador, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorDias, Joana Matos-
dc.contributor.authorGodinho, Pedro-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-14T17:03:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-14T17:03:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-29-
dc.identifier.issn1475-3995pt
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/87194-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, a new methodology for computing relative-robust portfolios based on minimax regret is proposed. Regret is defined as the utility loss for the investor resulting from choosing a given portfolio instead of choosing the optimal portfolio of the realized scenario. The absolute robust strategy was also considered and, in this case, the minimum investor’s expected utility in the worst-case scenario is maximized. Several subsamples are gathered from the in-sample data and for each subsample a minimax regret and a maximin solution are computed, to avoid the risk of overfitting. Robust portfolios are computed using a genetic algorithm, allowing the transformation of a 3-level optimization problem in a 2-level problem. Results show that the proposed relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms (other) relative-robust and non-robust portfolios, except for the global minimum variance portfolio. Furthermore, the relative-robust portfolio generally outperforms the absolute-robust portfolio, even considering higher risk aversion levels.pt
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherWileypt
dc.relationUID/Multi/00308/2019pt
dc.rightsembargoedAccesspt
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/pt
dc.subjectRobust optimizationpt
dc.subjectportfolio selectionpt
dc.subjectrelative robustnesspt
dc.subjectminimax regretpt
dc.titlePortfolio selection under uncertainty: a new methodology for computing relative‐robust solutionspt
dc.typearticle-
degois.publication.titleInternational Transactions in Operational Researchpt
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12674pt
dc.peerreviewedyespt
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/itor.12674pt
dc.date.embargo2021-04-28*
uc.date.periodoEmbargo730pt
uc.controloAutoridadeSim-
item.fulltextCom Texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.project.grantnoInstitute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra-
crisitem.author.researchunitINESC Coimbra – Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra-
crisitem.author.researchunitCeBER – Centre for Business and Economics Research-
crisitem.author.researchunitCeBER – Centre for Business and Economics Research-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2517-7905-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2247-7101-
Appears in Collections:I&D CeBER - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Sep 23, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

10
checked on Sep 2, 2024

Page view(s)

311
checked on Oct 1, 2024

Download(s)

409
checked on Oct 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons