Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096
Title: | Daylighting simulation of a heritage building by comparing matrix methods and solar models | Authors: | Saraiva, Nuno Baía Rodrigues, Eugénio Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues Costa, José Joaquim da |
Keywords: | Lighting modeling; Historic buildings; Climate-based methods; Indoor illuminance; Natural lighting | Issue Date: | Aug-2021 | Publisher: | Elsevier | Project: | PTDC/EMS-ENE/3238/2014 POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016760 |
metadata.degois.publication.title: | Solar Energy | metadata.degois.publication.volume: | 224 | Abstract: | Lighting simulation is a useful instrument in predicting lighting conditions in buildings. Modelers can use several matrix methods according to the buildings’ characteristics and the objectives of the analysis. However, it is unknown which methods are the most appropriate for lighting analysis of heritage buildings. The Joanina Library located in the University of Coimbra – a World Heritage building – was used to compare different matrix methods (2PH, 3PH, and 5PH) under several solar models (BRL, DISC, Perez, and Reindl) using Radiance-based simulations. On-site measurements (indoor and outdoor) were used to calculate each method’s accuracy under different solar models. The combination of the 2PH method with the DISC solar model presented the highest accuracy with an average MBEr and RMSEr of 2.8 % and 43.6 %, respectively. Therefore, the 2PH method was the best choice for the case study, even though the 3PH method may also be considered, especially for parametric studies of improving measures. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/95096 | ISSN: | 0038-092X | DOI: | 10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.085 | Rights: | embargoedAccess |
Appears in Collections: | FCTUC Eng.Electrotécnica - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais I&D ADAI - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manuscript.pdf | 43.91 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
5
checked on Oct 28, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
4
checked on Oct 2, 2024
Page view(s)
200
checked on Oct 29, 2024
Download(s)
76
checked on Oct 29, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License