Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105841
Title: Risk Calculators in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review
Authors: Ribeiro, Joana Silva 
Pereira, Daniela 
Salagre, Estela
Coroa, Manuel 
Santos Oliveira, Pedro
Santos, Vítor 
Madeira, Nuno 
Grande, Iria
Vieta, Eduard
Keywords: bipolar disorder; bipolar depression; risk prediction; risk calculator; risk score
Issue Date: 6-Aug-2020
Publisher: MDPI
Project: CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-028214 
POCI-01-0145-FEDER-30943 
metadata.degois.publication.title: Brain Sciences
metadata.degois.publication.volume: 10
metadata.degois.publication.issue: 8
Abstract: Introduction: Early recognition of bipolar disorder improves the prognosis and decreases the burden of the disease. However, there is a significant delay in diagnosis. Multiple risk factors for bipolar disorder have been identified and a population at high-risk for the disorder has been more precisely defined. These advances have allowed the development of risk calculators to predict individual risk of conversion to bipolar disorder. This review aims to identify the risk calculators for bipolar disorder and assess their clinical applicability. Methods: A systematic review of original studies on the development of risk calculators in bipolar disorder was performed. The studies’ quality was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies and according to recommendations of the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis Initiative. Results: Three studies met the inclusion criteria; one developed a risk calculator of conversion from major depressive episode to bipolar disorder; one of conversion to new-onset bipolar spectrum disorders in o spring of parents with bipolar disorder; and the last one of conversion in youths with bipolar disorder not-otherwise-specified. Conclusions: The calculators reviewed in this article present good discrimination power for bipolar disorder, although future replication and validation of the models is needed.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105841
ISSN: 2076-3425
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10080525
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:FMUC Medicina - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
checked on Jul 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on Jul 2, 2024

Page view(s)

122
checked on Oct 30, 2024

Download(s)

57
checked on Oct 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons