Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/116801
Title: A comparison between FEM predictions and DIC results of crack tip displacement field in CT specimens made of titanium
Authors: Gómez Gonzáles, G.L.
Antunes, F.V.
Sérgio, Edmundo R. 
Vasco-Olmo, J.M.
Díaz, F.A.
Neto, D. M. 
Keywords: Fatigue crack growth (FCG); Crack tip; Digital Image Correlation (DIC); Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD); Finite Element Method (FEM); Grade 2 Titanium
Issue Date: 20-Aug-2023
Publisher: Elsevier
Project: UIDB/00285/2020 
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/LA/P/0112/2020 
metadata.degois.publication.title: Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
metadata.degois.publication.volume: 127
Abstract: In the context of fatigue crack growth (FCG), the validation of FEM predictions with experimental results has been made in terms of crack closure and da/dN. The objective here is to compare the prediction of the displacement field, which is the primary output of FEM, with experimental results obtained with Digital Image Correlation (DIC). The qualitative comparison indicates that DIC and FEM results are very similar. The comparison of CTOD curves obtained behind the crack tip showed a good agreement between the DIC and numerical predictions obtained under plane strain conditions. This indicates the dominance of the interior regions over the surface displacements, although the small thickness of the specimen (1 mm). The more detailed analysis of the CTOD loops, through the values of plastic CTOD ranges, showed a significant difference between FEM predictions and DIC results. The robustness of the numerical model was checked considering a mesh sensibility analysis, as well as considering different sets of material parameters in the simulation.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/116801
ISSN: 01678442
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.104055
Rights: openAccess
Appears in Collections:I&D CEMMPRE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
S016784422300318X.htm161.99 kBHTMLView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 4, 2024

Page view(s)

15
checked on Nov 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons